In Understanding
Theology And Popular Culture, Gordon Lynch sets out to provide an overview
of key discussions and methods for religious studies scholars who want to
engage in the critical study of popular culture. He works through some terms
and methodology and then discusses some text-specific analysis.
Lynch
first attempts to define what we mean by “popular culture”; or more accurately,
he acknowledges that the term “pop culture” has been used in different ways by
different writers in different academic disciplines. Pop culture can be defined
roughly in relation to a cultural “other”:
1) pop culture as an opposing form
to high culture (visiting a museum
vs. watching professional
“wrestling)
2) pop culture as defined in
relation to both high and folk culture (high culture is a gourmet
meal, folk culture is Grandma’s casserole, pop culture is McDonald’s
3) pop culture as a form of
social/cultural resistance against dominant
or mass culture (punks using
safety pins as decoration; this implies the notion of bricolage, a la Michel de Certeau)
Lynch’s own assertion is that we
should think about popular culture as the shared environment, practices, and
resources of everyday life within which popular texts and trends are both produced
and consumed. This helps us maintain an open mind as in the analysis and
critique of contemporary society.
Lynch also lists 4 broad approaches
to putting religion and popular culture in dialogue.
A) The study of religion in relation to the environment,
resources, and practices of everyday life: This involves looking at the
ways in which popular practices have shaped the beliefs, structures, or
practices of religious groups; how the relationship between religion and
popular culture is represented in wider forms of pop culture; and how the
relationship between religion and popular culture is influenced by the ways in
which religious groups interact with wider pop culture.
B) The study of ways in which popular culture may serve
religious functions in contemporary society: a substantive definition understands religion “as characterized by
certain core elements, e.g., belief in dieties or supernatural forces, people
with religions roles (priest, shaman), sacred scriptures, tradition, ritual,
and space.” (27) The functionalist
definition of religion assumes it is characterized, not by certain core
elements, but by its ability to perform certain functions for individuals or
groups. These functions might be social, hermeneutical, or transcendent.
C) A missiological response to popular culture:
conservative Christian groups see culture as separate from the sacred and in
need of redemption. Niebuhr’s Christ
& Culture is an example of this.
D) The use of popular cultural texts and trends as a
medium for theological reflection: writers in this tradition explore
popular culture in relation to biblical texts or particular theological
concepts.
Lynch
then moves on to discuss how electronic media and consumption play specific
roles in our lives. Lynch rejects
technological determinism, and notes that electronic media have made people
less connected to local communities and traditions while increasing their
involvement with electronically mediated ones. Furthermore, “the concepts,
symbols, images, and stories communicated within the ‘market-place’ of
electronic media play a growing role in shaping people’s personal identities
and understanding of the wider world.” (55) Consumption is not just a way to
stay warm and fed but a means for expressing one’s individual identity.
Lynch
concludes with an examination of the music of rapper Eminem (via author-focused
approach), an episode of The Simpsons
(via text-based approach), and rave culture in England (via ethnographic
approach). He concludes with questions one might ask to develop a theological
aesthetics of popular culture, e.g., “Does this pop culture text require skill,
exemplify originality, encourage constructive relationships, etc.?” (191)
Lynch, G. (2005). Understanding theology and popular culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
No comments:
Post a Comment